Date: 25.9.2017 / Article Rating: 5 / Votes: 703
Proofreadonline.scholar.cloudns.cx #Usc personal statement msw

Recent Posts

Home >> Uncategorized >> Usc personal statement msw

Usc personal statement msw

Mar/Wed/2018 | Uncategorized





Applying to USC | Admissions MSW

Usc personal statement msw

Custom Essay Writing Service -
Usc personal statement msw - Last

Ato Ahwoi’s conviction was an error - Martin Amidu. General News of Wednesday, 17 August 2016. Former Attorney General and Minister for Justice, Martin Amidu has said the Supreme Court’s conviction and sentencing of one the directors of usc personal statement Accra-based Montie FM, Ato Ahwoi was an error. He argues that because Network Broadcasting Limited, Montie FM’s mother company had fully been represented in pe gcse coursework, court, trying Mr. Usc Personal? Ahwoi separately was “a grave miscarriage of justice.” “The purported conviction of Consultancy Mr. Ato Ahwoi as a director for an offence which the limited liability company in which he is a director had already been convicted and usc personal msw, sentenced to a fine of GH30,000. Term Paper? 00 is a fundamental error of law that has occasioned a grave miscarriage of justice to him,” he said in a latest piece. Salifu Maase, host and his two panelists; Alistair Nelson and Godwin Ako Gunn, commonly referred to as the usc personal statement msw Montie trio, are currently serving a four month prison sentence handed them by the Supreme Court in July, after they were found guilty of contempt charges. The two panelists had on a radio programme threatened to eliminate justices of the Supreme Court over coursework their handling of the lawsuit questioning the credibility of Ghana’s voters’ register. The four directors of Network Broadcasting Limited; Ato Ahwoi, Edward Addo, Kwesi Kyei Atuah, and usc personal msw, Kwesi Bram Addo were also asked to pay a fine of Ghc30,000.

But Martin Amidu in his latest piece insisted that the Supreme Courts trial of Ato Ahwoi despite conviction of the Network Broadcasting Company which is a limited liability company breached the 1992 Constitution. “The triteness of this law is that once the trial, conviction and sentencing of the Network Broadcasting Company Limited had been completed the Network Broadcasting Company Limited could not under Article 19(7) of the 1992 Constitution be charged with the same offences again. It follows that Mr. Ato Ahwoi who was merely one of the claim directors of the company benefits from the immunity acquired by the company and msw, could not also be tried personally for the same offence a second time,” he added. No lawyer for Ahwoi. “Regrettably, and unfortunately, because the Supreme Court choose to prosecute and judge a contempt ex facie curiae by itself, it unwittingly failed to allow Mr. Ato Ahwoi the basic right to a lawyer before taking his plea, follow the Consultancy due process of law, and usc personal statement, convicted him when it should have been trite that he was being put in double jeopardy for the same offence after the earlier conviction and sentencing of the company for which he is director.

It is pe gcse aqa, instructive that after purporting to convict Mr. Ato Ahwoi, the Court found itself unable to sentence him personally for usc personal msw the alleged criminal contempt of court. For Resume? The purported arraignment and personal conviction of msw Mr. Ahwoi as a director of the company in addition to the earlier conviction of the company itself was inconsistent with and in contravention of Article 19(7) of the 1992 Constitution.” Below is Martin Amidu’s full piece. MONTIE FM CRIMINAL CONTEMPT – MARTIN AMIDU’S TAKE.

I read pieces of pe gcse coursework what has now become popularly known as the Montie 3 contempt of court contempt proceedings, convictions, and sentencing ruling and usc personal, decision or orders on the web – particularly the Ghana Web. True to my self- imposed embargo upon the demise of my dear mother on 6th March 2016 to mourn her and stay out of the eyes of the media for some time, I defied the temptations put on my path by media houses and fellow citizens insisting on hearing my comment or urging me to proffer my written views on those proceedings. I excused myself with not having read the sentencing ruling and simple essay introducing, decision of the Supreme Court. A contemporary of statement mine at Law School and in Government baited me by e-mailing to Report, me scanned certified true copies of both the sentencing ruling and decision with the request that I acquaint him with my opinion of the case after I had read it. Usc Personal Statement Msw? This paper is the result of that understanding. I have consequently read a certified true copy of the sheet sentencing ruling, and the decision in the Owners of the Station Montie FM criminal contempt of court case and come to the considered conclusion that it raises several issues of constitutional, professional, and public importance.

It is beyond argument that the Supreme Court is clothed with the statement msw power to commit for contempt of itself under the 1992 Constitution. But the same Constitution enjoins the paper term paper writers Supreme Court to exercise all its powers in accordance with the due process of msw law and to respect the fundamental human rights and freedoms guaranteed under it. I take the humble view that even though the courts’ powers for committing for contempt of themselves have often been described as almost arbitrary, that may only approximate the truth when one is dealing with contempt committed in facie curiae – in aqa, the face of the court or in court, so to speak – to be dealt with on the spot. However, when the contempt is a criminal contempt committed ex facie curiae (out of Court) the msw Court has no power or authority under the fundamental human rights and freedoms guaranteed by 1992 Constitution to proceed as the complainant, prosecutor, judge and jury in its own cause. The trial must be adversarial and simple essay, comply with due the process of law of usc personal statement msw a fair trial. Consultancy? The inquisitorial Star Chambers method of usc personal ancient Britain by which the accused were brought before and tried by the Court was clearly inconsistent with and in contravention of introducing myself Articles 12, 14(1), 19(2)©(d)(g) (10) and (18), 21(1)(a), and 33(5) of the 1992 Constitution. I came to the conclusion that the lawyers for the accused persons did not help the Court and the accused persons when they failed or refused to raise all the constitutional and legal defences against the charges and arraignment processes. They led their all trusting clients to the Court to usc personal statement, plead guilty to the alleged charges of criminal contempt only to turn round to criticize the Court for interfering with the contemnors’ right to free speech because of the magnitude of the sentences imposed by cover sheet, the Court.

I also take the further view that if the lawyers for the accused persons had insisted on the constitutional rights of the accused person to a fair trial throughout the proceedings the situation where the ambiguous 1st contemnor called “Owners of the Station – Montie FM” was transformed into Network Broadcasting Company Limited, and Zee Zee Media Limited and each director and officer of the corporate persons hauled individually, arraigned and msw, personally convicted in addition to the conviction of each company would have been avoided. THE LAWYER’S RESPONSIBILITY TO THE ACCUSED AND TO THE COURT. Pe Gcse? It does not appear from the sentencing ruling of the Supreme Court that the usc personal statement msw lawyers for the accused contemnors raised any preliminary objection, at the arraignment of the accused to plead to the criminal contempt charges, to Consultancy, the lack of constitutional jurisdiction in the Court to try the accused persons inquisitorially. The lawyer’s responsibility to the court and to his client is to put up all the best objections and defences for his client. The Court could have been persuaded that the non-adversarial manner by which it had brought the contemnors to the Court was inconsistent with the fundamental human rights and usc personal msw, freedoms guaranteed by paper writers paper writers, Chapter 5 of the 1992 Constitution, particularly Articles 12, 14(1), 19(2)©(d)(g) (10) and (18), 21(1)(a), and 33(5) thereof. Usc Personal Msw? The outline of the argument could have been that the process by which the contemnors were brought to the Court deprived them of their right to a fair trial under Article 19 of the and juliet 2 essay Constitution as the process adopted by the Court presumed them guilty contrary to usc personal statement msw, clause 2(c) thereof which enjoins that he “be presumed to coursework, be innocent until he is proved or has pleaded guilty”. It could also have been contended that the summary manner the Court was proceeding was depriving the contemnors of their constitutional right to be informed in detail of the nature of the offence charged and consequently being deprived of adequate time and statement, facilities for the preparation of their defence contrary to sub-clauses (d), (e), and (g) of Article 19(2) thereof. It could further have been submitted to the Court that the manner it was proceeding summarily in the criminal contempt by calling upon the contemnors to show cause why they should not be committed for criminal contempt of court offends Article 19(10) which enjoins that: “No person who is tried for a criminal offence shall be compelled to give evidence at the trial”. Letter For Pf? The Court could have been reminded that Article 19(12) of the 1992 Constitution makes only one exception for the Court when trying criminal contempt of court by usc personal statement, excluding only the application of Article 19(11) which requires that: “no person shall be convicted for application for pf claim a criminal offence unless the offence is defined and the penalty for statement msw it prescribed in a written law.” It would have been obvious to the Court that if the framers of the simple essay myself Constitution had intended the courts to try offences of criminal contempt inquisitorially contrary to the other guaranteed fair trial clauses of Article 19 of the msw Constitution they would have specifically said so in Article 19(12).

The foregoing submission could have been inextricably interwoven with submissions on application claim, the guaranteed freedom of speech and statement, expression which includes the freedom of the press and other media under Article 21(1)(a) of the Constitution. It could have also been contended that the inquisitorial approach of the discredited Star Chambers of old in punishing non-adversarially for criminal contempt have not only be discarded in all civilized democratic countries but that Articles 12 and 33(5) of the Constitution enjoins the Supreme Court of Ghana to pe gcse coursework, protect, defend and guarantee the rights, duties, declarations, and guarantees not specifically mentioned which are considered to be inherent in a democracy and intended to secure the freedom and dignity of man”. It could have been submitted with the aid of decided cases (including the Supreme Court’s Republic v Kwabena Mensa-Bonsu 2 Others: Ex Parte Attorney-General [1995-96] 1 GLR 377) that even the Anglo-Saxon jurisprudence which we inherited has long considered prosecutions for usc personal statement msw criminal contempt as being inconsistent with rights inherent in a democracy let alone an inquisitorial approach long discarded by our colonial masters who introduced us to it. In accordance with the doctrine of judicial precedent the Consultancy Report case of the statement Republic v Kwabena Mensa-Bonsu alone would have provided material on which to anchor strong constitutional and legal arguments why the procedure by which the contemnors were brought to the Court was unconstitutional and inconsistent with the Court’s jurisdiction under the letter for pf claim Constitution. The case of the Republic v Liberty Press Ltd 28 Others [1968] GLR 123 could also have been persuasive. These are examples of ex facie contempt tried adversarially and usc personal msw, not inquisitorially. The Liberty Press Ltd case upon which the Supreme Court apparently relied in formulating parts of its sentencing ruling and the binding Kwabena Mensa-Bonsu case, which the Court overlooked, show that the trial of any charge of criminal contempt of court partakes of the same characteristics as the trial of any other criminal offences with the prosecution having the letter for pf claim burden of proving the guilt of the accused persons beyond a reasonable doubt including all the presumptions of innocence etc. These cases would have been helpful in formulating the submission to the Court as a preliminary objection to the inquisitorial summons by which the contemnors or the accused persons were brought before the Court. In the very scheme of our Constitution, the Court would have been compelled to decide the preliminary objection to the inquisitorial procedure adopted to usc personal msw, try the contemnors for the offences charged. The beauty of our judicial process is that the Court even if it overruled all the preliminary objections would have been compelled to assign considered reasons for rejecting them.

The ruling or judgment will be a public testament of the Court’s decision in such important Constitutional and democratic matters to which the Consultancy Report justices will eternally be judged. No court or judge wants to statement, be associated with indefensible rulings touching the fundamental rights and freedoms in democracies such as ours. Both the legal arguments or submissions, and Report, the court’s ruling act as a restraining factor on the contempt of court powers which have already been recognized as being arbitrary. The lawyers in Liberty Press Ltd, and usc personal statement msw, Kwabena Mensa-Bonsu knew this and took their chances and letter claim, even though the accused in the Liberty Press Ltd case later changed their pleas to guilty and those in the Mensa-Bonsu case eventually lost the trial the public and the legal profession will continue to judge the conduct of the justices in usc personal, those cases. The preliminary objection to the procedure and the charge of criminal contempt has nothing to Report, do with the guilt or innocence of the contemnors.

The accused person had a constitutional right to usc personal msw, challenge the Republic in whose name the crime of criminal contempt was being prosecuted by the trial court on cover sheet letter for resume, its own motion to prove his guilt adversarially and beyond a reasonable doubt. The lawyers unfortunately failed or refused to discharge their responsibilities to the accused persons and to usc personal msw, the Court. Application Letter For Pf Claim? THE RULING AND SENTENCING DECISIONS OF THE COURT. The contempt for which the accused persons were hauled to the Court was committed ex facie curiae – out of court. I was consequently interested in the title of the criminal contempt case. Contempt of statement scandalizing the court with which the essay myself accused persons were charged is a criminal offence and like all criminal offences must under Article 88 of the Constitution be prosecuted in the name of the Republic and by the Attorney-General or any other person authorized by him in accordance with law. But because the Court had assumed the statement arbitrary power of being the for pf complainant, prosecutor, and judge in its own cause the title of the case was Abu Ramadan, Evans Nimako vrs. 1. Electoral Commission 2. Statement Msw? The Attorney General, In Re: 1. The Owners of the Station – Montie FM, 2. Salifu Maase @ Mugabe (3) Alistair Nelson (4) Godwin Ako Gunn as though the criminal contempt was committed in facie curiae.

In the Republic v. Liberty Press Ltd 28 Others [1968] GLR 123 and and juliet act 2 scene 2 essay, Republic v Kwabena Mensa-Bonsu 2 Others both of which were ex facie curiae contempt, the prosecution for contempt was initiated and conducted by the Attorney General in the High Court and the Supreme Court respectively and usc personal, gave the accused persons the right to a fair trial. The reason why the appropriate procedure promotes fairness and justice was aptly indicated in the ruling of Akufo-Addo CJ (as he then was) sitting as an additional High Court judge as follows: “In so far as my decision embodies any general conclusions affecting the jurisdiction of the courts in contempt matters, it is referable only to contempt ex facie curiae (out of court) as distinct from cover sheet letter for resume contempt in facie curiae which is always dealt with “on the spot,” so to usc personal, speak, without any intervention of the essay myself Attorney-General applying for a writ of attachment.” The Supreme Court in Kwabena Mensa-Bonsu underscored the msw difference between contempt in the face of the court and Report, the prosecution of ex facie criminal contempt of usc personal msw court cases and arrived at the same conclusion. Regrettably such an important issue was not raised by aqa, the accused persons as a preliminary point to usc personal msw, jurisdiction at cover, their arraignment. And as the ruling shows the Court was exasperated by usc personal statement msw, the Attorney-General’s lack of responsiveness to the execution of her constitutional duties that it decided unwittingly to treat the matter as though the contempt was committed in court and act 2 scene, was being dealt with ‘“on the spot” so to speak’. In the rulings in Liberty Press Ltd, and usc personal, Kwabena Mensa-Bonsu the rulings adequately state not only the term charges but also in detail the particularly of the charges faced by the accused persons. The sentencing ruling in the Owners of the Station – Montie FM case does not state the particulars (let alone in detail) of the nature of the offences charged, to have enabled the accused persons to have known the details of their crime to enable them plead knowingly to the charges. It only states that they were brought before the court for usc personal statement contempt of court on three grounds namely”: (a) Scandalizing the court (b) Defying and lowering the authority of this court and (3) Bringing the authority of this court into disrepute.” What is stated as three separate offences are not mutually exclusive offences one of the other and without detailed particulars accompanying each offence the charges were on their face bad for duplicity and also inconsistent with Article 19 of the 1992 Constitution on fair trial. Myself? Reading the sentencing ruling of the Court one gets the impression that the summons for the accused persons and the directors and officers of the two corporations to appear before the Court to usc personal msw, answer the allegations of criminal contempt did not contain particulars of the contumacious words, the date and the venue at which they were spoken or broadcast so as to enable the essay introducing accused persons to be informed in usc personal statement, detail of the pe gcse coursework nature of the usc personal statement msw offences charged in accordance with Article 19(2)(e) of the Constitution. The lack of particulars of the crime to the accused persons is Report, brought out in the ruling when the Court stated that it was shocked and saddened to hear each of the directors “as well as their Company Secretary say that, until a recording of the offending programme was played in Court they had not listened to nor heard the reprehensible utterances…, despite the fact that, for a couple of weeks both the print media and radio stations had been full of discussions of the diatribe that was aired by their station, Montie FM.” Far from being an indictment on the accused persons it demonstrates that they were arbitrarily hauled before the Court without any semblance of the due process of law in criminal justice administration as mandated by the Constitution. Their criminal charges were clearly bad for lack of usc personal particulars at arraignment.

It follows from the foregoing that the constitutional rights of the accused person under Article 19(2)(e) of the Constitution enjoining the Court that the accused “be given adequate time and and juliet scene, facilities for the preparation of his defence” was also violated. Owners of the Station Montie FM not legal persons for personal service of charges. The first contemnor in the Montie case is called: “Owners of the Station – Montie FM” and not even simply “Montie FM”. It is trite learning that because criminal contempt can be proceeded against only natural or legal persons as defined in our laws the names of each of the usc personal statement msw accused persons must be specifically and unambiguously stated in each count and detailed particulars of the charge provided to the accused. Scene 2 Essay? It is also trite law that in criminal contempt proceedings each accused person must be served personally with the summons, motion or process to appear before the court. Usc Personal Statement Msw? The name “Owners of the Station – Montie FM” is not the name or names of any person who could have been served personally with the summons or processes for criminal contempt ordered by the court which was making its own complaint, prosecuting same, judging same and being jury for same. How parties are summoned to a court is as important, and part and parcel of the delivery of justice under our constitutional protection of human rights and freedoms binding upon the Court. The Court recognized in its ruling that there were no natural or legal persons called Owners of the romeo scene Station – Montie FM upon whom service of the notices or summons for contempt could have been personally served. This was why the ruling of the Court states that “the court summoned the directors and secretary of Network Broadcasting Co. Ltd because, as owners of usc personal statement msw Motie FM, the company provided the physical facilities for the contemptuous statement to be aired to the public” and it is the directors and officers who answer for it when it is held in contempt. The Court then states the fact that for an unincorporated body the members of the Consultancy body answer for msw it.

The Court supports its conclusions as follows: “Hence in the case of the Republic v. Liberty Press Ltd (supra), it was the for pf Managing Director of the Liberty Press Ltd, the printer and 28 professors and lecturer who were members of ‘Legon Society on National Affairs’, publishers of Legon Observer, who answered for the publication in that magazine that scandalized the judiciary. That is statement, what happened in Liberty Press Ltd with the difference that each of the 28 professors who were members of the unincorporated “Legon Society on National Affairs” were specifically named and served personally with the romeo act 2 scene 2 essay criminal contempt process – the pursuant notices – to each appear to answer the msw charges against them. Sheet Letter For Resume? The Managing Director of Liberty Press Ltd represented the legal person Liberty Press Ltd and not each of the directors and officers of Liberty Press Ltd under the name “Owners of the msw Printing Press – Liberty Press Limited”. A careful reading of the ruling of the Supreme Court in Owners of the Station – Montie FM leaves one in Consultancy, no doubt that the Network Broadcasting Co. Usc Personal? Lt. or another limited liability company called Zee Zee Media Ghana Ltd referred to in the ruling were never served personally with any processes for paper writers paper criminal contempt of court to commence any contempt proceedings against them. One walks away with the unavoidable impression that when the Supreme Court decided to summon the suspects called Owners of the Station – Montie FM before it, the Court did not even know the legal status of Montie FM or the specific identity of its owners and therefore resorted to the arbitrary power of fishing at large for statement whosever would be caught by the phraseology the sheet letter Owners of the usc personal statement Station – Montie FM.

It then discovers that two limited liability companies – Network Broadcasting Co. Ltd or another limited liability company called Zee Zee Media Ghana Ltd own the physical infrastructure and frequency respectively. The Court then proceeds to romeo scene, summon the statement Secretaries and directors of the two companies without apparently first formally summoning and serving the two companies in name as accused contemnors. Such fishing by the Court for evidence of identity of the accused persons is clearly unconstitutional. The ruling cites Liberty Press Ltd as an example and to justify the manner it summoned the Secretaries and application letter for pf claim, Directors of Network Broadcasting Co. Ltd and Zee Zee Media Ghana Ltd to usc personal, appear before it. Essay? Unfortunately the analogy flies in the face of reason. In Liberty Press Ltd on which the msw Court relied for its propositions of law the Managing Director is the cover sheet letter only person stated in the report of that ruling to have represented the company. It is axiomatic that once there was a Managing Director the company also had a Board of Directors and msw, other officers but they were not summoned as it was superfluous for letter them to appear before the court individually and personally to answer the company’s charges of msw criminal contempt.

Harry Zakour is and juliet 2 essay, recorded on statement, the sentencing decision of the Court made on pe gcse, 27th July 2016 as present for 1st Contemnors – “The Owners of the Station – Montie FM”. The Supreme Court both in the sentencing ruling and decision recognize that: “It is trite law that where a corporation is held in contempt of court, it is the directors and officers who answer for msw it, since they constitute the human face of the legal entity…” and application, consequently made the following orders in respect of Network Broadcasting Company Limited and Zee Zee Media Ltd: “3. Network Broadcasting Company Limited and Zee Zee Media Ltd are each hereby ordered to msw, pay a fine of GH30, 000.00 by close of for pf 28th July 2016. The officers of Network Broadcasting Company Limited and Zee Zee Media Ghana Ltd shall be respectively held personally liable to imprisonment for usc personal statement any failure to comply with any of these orders.” The second sentence in cover sheet, the decision or order No. 3 is superfluous because it merely states what the law in usc personal statement, respect of the liability of all corporations for contempt is. But the person convicted is the company as the decision of the Court shows.

It is also trite law that incorporated companies in contempt of court are fined and not imprisoned because the artificial legal person represented by the company is a notional concept and not physically available for imprisonment. But it is coursework, also trite law that whosoever pleads to a charge of usc personal statement msw contempt of court on behalf of such a legal person does so with proper authority to represent the Report company. A corollary of the trite law referred to statement, by the sheet Court is that the legal person in contempt is the company and not its officers who are only vicariously liable for paying the fines or going to prison on behalf of the company. From the usc personal statement Supreme Court’s own statement of the law in Liberty Press Co Ltd the directors and officers of a company are not personally the contemnors as was the case with the unincorporated “Legon Society on National Affairs” where each of the 28 professors and cover letter for resume, lecturers who were its members were individually charged and pleaded to the charge in person and were individually convicted. The position would have been the usc personal msw same even if Montie FM was said to be an unincorporated body. The corporations and not its officers individually would still be the owners. Consequently, any disclosure in romeo and juliet 2 essay, the record of proceedings in Owners of the Station – Montie FM showing that each of the directors and officers of the corporations were individually summoned by the Court and usc personal statement, forced to and juliet act 2 scene, each plead to the charges against the corporation in person and each convicted is clearly a violation of statement of the trite law by the Court and statement, also of the 1992 Constitution.

Ato Ahwoi the Endnote. The foregoing analysis and statement of the triteness of the law by the Court itself on Consultancy, this matter is what makes it absurd that the sentencing decision of the Supreme Court has an end note stating that one of the Directors of the 1st Contemnor in the person of Mr. Ato Ahwoi, who was absent on the days the matter was heard, appeared and pleaded liable with explanation. Mr. Ato Ahwoi by the Court’s own statement of the law is a director of Network Broadcasting Company Limited, a legal person in its own right.

Without any evidence that the company was properly served with contempt proceedings, an statement msw authorized representative of the company had already appeared before the Court and simple essay introducing, pleaded on behalf of the company upon which the company had already been convicted. After the conclusion of the sentencing the Network Broadcasting Company Limited and statement msw, the other contemnors for criminal contempt of court, the writers term writers Court is msw, informed that one of the directors who was absent from the jurisdiction is in court in obedience to an order or request by the court that all directors of the company should appear before the Court apparently so that they will know how the legal person they collectively represent is to be dealt with. Without further ado the Court takes the plea of Mr. Ato Ahwoi, a director of the already convicted and sentenced Network Broadcasting Company Limited without any record that the charges were read and explained to him. There is also no record in the end notes which represents the record of proceedings on and juliet act 2 scene 2 essay, this director, Mr. Ahwoi, to show that he was represented by a lawyer or that he had opted to represent himself in person. He pleads guilty with explanation. At worst this plea of guilty with explanation on the triteness of the law was being entered by Mr.

Ato Ahwoi on behalf of the Network Broadcasting Company Limited which had already been convicted and sentenced before he was called upon in the “end note” to plead again to an offence which had already been dealt with. The Court without giving any reasons why the explanation of Mr. Ato Ahwoi constitutes an unequivocal plea of guilty convicts him in the following words: “By Court: Mr. Ato Ahwoi is hereby convicted on all the charges on his own plea of liability.” The purported conviction of Mr. Ato Ahwoi as a director for an offence which the limited liability company in which he is a director had already been convicted and sentenced to a fine of GH30,000. 00 is a fundamental error of law that has occasioned a grave miscarriage of justice to him. The triteness of this law is that once the trial, conviction and sentencing of the Network Broadcasting Company Limited had been completed the Network Broadcasting Company Limited could not under Article 19(7) of the 1992 Constitution be charged with the same offences again. It follows that Mr. Ato Ahwoi who was merely one of the usc personal msw directors of the company benefits from the immunity acquired by the company and could not also be tried personally for the same offence a second time. Regrettably, and unfortunately, because the Supreme Court choose to prosecute and judge a contempt ex facie curiae by term, itself, it unwittingly failed to allow Mr. Ato Ahwoi the basic right to a lawyer before taking his plea, follow the due process of usc personal statement msw law, and convicted him when it should have been trite that he was being put in double jeopardy for the same offence after the earlier conviction and sentencing of the company for which he is letter for pf, director.

It is instructive that after purporting to convict Mr. Ato Ahwoi, the Court found itself unable to sentence him personally for the alleged criminal contempt of court. The purported arraignment and personal conviction of Mr. Ahwoi as a director of the company in addition to the earlier conviction of the company itself was inconsistent with and in contravention of Article 19(7) of the 1992 Constitution. Precedent of the Presidential Election Petition – Contempt Convictions. Usc Personal Statement? There are those who would be tempted to raise the issue of the purported convictions for criminal contempt in the Presidential Elections Petition of persons from the two largest political parties in Ghana as precedent for the Court’s procedure in this case as well. My answer to them is that if those proceedings also suffered from the same violations of the for pf claim 1992 Constitution as I have demonstrated in this paper then those convictions were inconsistent with provisions of the Constitution and also void. Usc Personal Msw? In this regard the wisdom contained in the dissenting opinion of the late eminent and very distinguished Supreme Court Judge, Mr. Justice Adade, in Bilson v Apaloo [1981] GLR 24 at 69-70, comes to mind. He said that: “….But it is said that the Court of Appeal has been sitting five all the time, and no one has raised a finger.

That does not mean that a finger can never be raised. It has been raised now, and cover, we cannot force it down. If in my reckoning, an error was committed then, there is no reason why that error should be perpetuated simply because it has been done with impunity in usc personal statement msw, the past. “Public policy and commonsense” pleaded by the defendant, cannot be suffered to act 2 scene, oust the operation of what, in my view, are the clear prescription of constitutional provision.” I say also that in so far as the Supreme Court did not avert its mind to the constitutional standards laid down in msw, the criminal contempt case of Kwabena Mensa-Bonsu on the procedure and burden of proof for the criminal contempt of scandalizing the court, the ruling in the Owners of the Station – Montie FM case was rendered in disregard of the Courts own previous and binding decision. In accordance with Article 129(3) of the Constitution the ruling in term term paper, the Owners of the Station – Montie FM was given per incuriam and consequently void under the Constitution. The Common law Tradition.

I wrote a case review in the 1989-90 Review of Ghana, at usc personal statement, pages 317-337 on Bail in Murder Cases in which I argued that the prohibition allegedly imposed by section 96(7)(a) of Act 30 on application for pf claim, the granting of bail to accused persons in murder and related offences were unconstitutional and void under the statement 1979 Constitution, and could not have been revived by the abrogation of that Constitution. The Supreme Court came to the same conclusion this year in Martin Kpebu v Attorney-General, 5th May 2016, several years after my case comment. What I said in that case comment defending the introducing myself liberty of the individual to statement, a fair trial seems appropriate even today to bear repetition. I wrote amongst other things that: ‘….It would be a sad day in the legal history of Anglo-Ghanaian jurisprudence when the simple introducing liberty of the individual becomes a clarion call for anarchy or a means of seeking judicial self-glorification per se. Mr. Justice Cardozo’s admonishment to judges of the common law tradition not to be knight-errants ought to be remembered by all those whose business is to judge. In pointing out the difference between “le phenomine Magnaud” and justice according to law he said: “The judge, even when he is free, is still not wholly free. He is not to innovate at pleasure. He is not a knight-errant, roaming at will in pursuit of his own ideals of beauty or goodness. He is to draw his inspiration from consecrated principles.

He is not to yield to spasmodic sentiments, to vague and unregulated benevolence. He is to exercise his discretion informed by tradition, methodized by analogy, disciplined by system, and subordinated to the ‘premodial necessity of order in social life’”. THE PREROGATIVE OF MERCY – PRESIDENTIAL PARDON. I find the immediate resort by the lawyers for the contemnors to petitioning the President for pardon for the contemnors revolting having regard to the context of the case, the background of the contemnors, and their association with the Government of the day. Usc Personal Msw? It embarrasses and encumbers the Presidential power of sheet letter for resume mercy which he may exercise in respect of any conviction for crime including the offences constituting criminal contempt of court after consultation with the Council of statement State. As for the argument that it will be an interference with the independence of the application for pf judiciary to usc personal statement msw, grant any pardon, I will like the proponents of that doctrine to tell the whole world which exercise of the President’s powers of pardon cannot be said to be an interference with judicial independence in the sense that it pardons convictions and/or sentences already imposed in exercise of the Court’s judicial power. That is introducing myself, why it is usc personal msw, a prerogative of mercy! : to “grant to a person convicted of an offence a pardon”…. Etc. And Juliet Scene? Anybody acquainted with the judicial process should know that there have been instances in which courts themselves have invited the President to consider exercising his powers of mercy by pardoning the usc personal convicted.

It will be an insult to the integrity, professionalism and essay introducing myself, maturity of our judicial system to say that the Court will be offended by any exercise of the powers of mercy by msw, the President, simply because the conviction was for contempt of the court. The advocates against pe gcse the exercise of the President’s powers of usc personal mercy in the Owners of the Station – Montie FM case may be ignorant of the fact that various Presidents under the application claim 1992 Constitution have in usc personal msw, the past exercised the power of pardon in favour of some convicted criminal contemnors whose cases arose from or as a result of constitutional litigation in the Supreme Court or other lower courts without any objection or bother from the judiciary. Why should the Owners of the Station – Montie FM case be an exception? The problem is that most convictions and sentences for criminal contempt arising from or associated with the conduct of constitutional cases in Consultancy Report, the courts invariably take on a partisan political flavor in this country, let alone in an election year. Usc Personal Msw? A dispassionate observer will not fail to see that with a few exceptions the arguments for and against perceptions of Report fairness of how the Owners of the Station – Montie FM case were tried; and whether or not the President could consider exercising his power of mercy at any appropriate time of usc personal his choice has been clouded by political party interest with an eye towards campaign rhetoric’s for the coming elections. In my respectful view the most objective justification for 2 essay the exercise of the msw power of mercy in this case is that the Court by adopting an unconstitutional procedure in convicting and imprisoning the contemnors, in one fell swoop, deprived them of any right of an romeo and juliet appeal or a review of the usc personal statement decision of the Court. The Court cannot be the Respondent in an application for review. It is also absurd to suggest that the paper writers term Attorney-General who did not initiate or conduct the contempt prosecutions can now be a Respondent to a review application on their behalf. The matter is complicated by the fact that jailing the accused at the close of the legal year unwittingly ensures that any application brought on their behalf may not be heard until after the vacation in October by which time they might have served almost the whole term of imprisonment. Statement? But as is usually the simple introducing case with most constitutional conflicts with partisan political undertones timing in whatever a President does is important for purposes of managing perceptions and wounded feelings.

The strategic resources at the disposal of every President are intended to guide him in taking decisions that meet his strategic vision for a nation and its public interest. I take cognizance of the fact that the msw convicted and Consultancy, imprisoned accused contemnors were convicted upon their own plea of guilty. But as I have demonstrated herein those pleas were procured in contravention of the usc personal statement fundamental rights and freedoms, and other provisions of the 1992 Constitution. I share all the sentiments expressed in Liberty Press Ltd, Kwabena Mensa-Bonsu and the sentencing ruling in romeo and juliet act 2, Owners of the Station – Montie FM on the sanctity and respect to be accorded by the citizen to the judiciary and the individual judge. It was for some of these reasons that I initiated, and conducted in person as the then Deputy Attorney-General the Kwabena Mensa-Bonsu criminal contempt prosecution in accordance with the due process of law and secured convictions and sentences.

As the longest served former Deputy Attorney-General, and usc personal, a former Attorney-General of Ghana, I have a history of ardently fighting against any attempt to Report, bring the judiciary into contempt and statement, disrepute in Report, any form whatsoever. I believe that the Constitution mandates every citizen to defend the judiciary within its permissible prescriptions. The sentencing ruling and decision of the Owners of the Station – Montie FM case, however runs roughshod over the liberty of the statement msw individual under Chapter 5 of the Consultancy Report Constitution. It is, therefore, with great reluctance that I write this considered paper in statement msw, defence of the 1992 Constitution. Martin A. B.K. Amidu. This article has 9 comment(s), give your comment. Sarkodie Started Our Beef – Quata Budukusu.

Actress Ahoufe Patri Parts Way With Kofas Media…See Reasons. Dome Kwabenya MP, Adwoa Safo Has Allegedly Slept With These Men (Photos) Meet The 4 Hottest Girls Davido Has Slept With – Number 2 Is So Beautiful. BREAKING NEWS: Sugar Truck Falls Off Circle Flyover And Lands On 207 Passenger Vehicle – Several Injured. Application Claim? President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo Meets UK Foreign Minister Boris Johnson. Shame:Married Woman Is Caught Red-Handed Having S3x With Her Best Friend#039;s Husband. Female Singer, Salti Paulette Goes Nude.

Her Motive Will Shock You. Girl Had S3x With A Guy Who Works In A Mortuary And This Mysterious Thing Happened. Big Brother Nigeria: A TV Reality Show or a Gathering of P0rn Stars? Mary Had S3x With Joseph Before Jesus Was Born – Nun Confesses. Akosua Abebrese Writes: I’ve Been Seeing Someone’s Husband for statement msw 3 Months Now And I Don’t Regret A Minute Of It.

State Attorney, Rebecca Aryitey-Smith collapses after walking to court. Nana Addo Beats Mahama As Ghana#039;s Most Influential On Social Media. Confession: I Don’t Wear Cheap Panties…I Wear Victoria Secret - Tracey Boakye. Yvonne Nelson Says God Mada Ghana Lose Because He Hates The Black Stars Players For Using ‘Juju’ Nollywood Actress, Angela Okerie Accused of Allegedly Sleeping With Gambian Ex-President Yahya Jammeh For $1.5m. Whatsapp Chats Exposes How Gospel Musician Brother Sammy Threatened To Kill His Unborn Baby With Musician Ohemaa Jacky. Simple Essay Myself? Actor-Emmanuel Armah Between Life and Death At 37 Military Hospital. Identical twins who spent 150 thousand pounds on usc personal statement, cosmetic surgery say they regret now. The Boobs And Hips On This Lady Though. A dream to SOME men. -) A rat exemplified motherly love when she risked her life fighting a snake that had snatched one of its babies. The snaked was slithering away with.

A three-year-old boy, Abubakar Usman, whose eyes were gouged out in January by suspected ritualists in Zaria, Kaduna state, Nigeria, has been enrolled in a. According to essay, online reports, this woman was seen breastfeeding her baby even though she just got her leg broken after a tragic accident and was.

Write My Research Paper for Me -
Msw Personal Statement Usc - Fluctus

nyu essay tips Your paper must offer an argument. It can't consist in the mere report of your opinions, nor in statement, a mere report of the opinions of the philosophers we discuss. You have to defend the claims you make. You have to offer reasons to sheet letter for resume, believe them. So you can't just say: My view is msw that P. You must say something like: My view is application letter that P. Statement Msw. I believe this because. or: I find that the following considerations. Letter For Pf. provide a convincing argument for statement msw, P. Pe Gcse Coursework. Similarly, don't just say: Descartes says that Q. Instead, say something like: Descartes says that Q; however, the following thought-experiment will show that Q is not true. or: Descartes says that Q. Statement. I find this claim plausible, for the following reasons. There are a variety of things a philosophy paper can aim to accomplish. Application Letter Claim. It usually begins by putting some thesis or argument on the table for consideration. Msw. Then it goes on to do one or two of the claim following: Criticize that argument; or show that certain arguments for the thesis are no good Defend the usc personal statement argument or thesis against someone else's criticism Offer reasons to believe the thesis Offer counter-examples to the thesis Contrast the strengths and coursework aqa weaknesses of two opposing views about the thesis Give examples which help explain the thesis, or which help to make the thesis more plausible Argue that certain philosophers are committed to the thesis by their other views, though they do not come out and explicitly endorse the thesis Discuss what consequences the usc personal statement msw thesis would have, if it were true Revise the thesis, in the light of some objection.

No matter which of sheet letter for resume these aims you set for yourself, you have to explicitly present reasons for the claims you make . Students often feel that since it's clear to them that some claim is true, it does not need much argument. But it's very easy to overestimate the strength of your own position. After all, you already accept it. You should assume that your audience does not already accept your position; and usc personal msw you should treat your paper as an attempt to persuade such an audience. Hence, don't start with assumptions which your opponents are sure to reject. Pe Gcse Coursework Aqa. If you're to have any chance of persuading people, you have to start from common assumptions you all agree to.

A good philosophy paper is msw modest and makes a small point ; but it makes that point clearly and straightforwardly, and it offers good reasons in support of it. People very often attempt to accomplish too much in application letter for pf claim, a philosophy paper. The usual result of statement msw this is term paper term writers a paper that's hard to read, and which is full of usc personal inadequately defended and paper writers poorly explained claims. So don't be over-ambitious. Don't try to establish any earth-shattering conclusions in your 5-6 page paper. Done properly, philosophy moves at a slow pace. The aim of these papers is for you to usc personal, show that you understand the material and that you're able to think critically about it.

To do this, your paper does have to show some independent thinking. That doesn't mean you have to sheet for resume, come up with your own theory, or that you have to make a completely original contribution to human thought. Msw. There will be plenty of time for that later on. Application Letter. An ideal paper will be clear and straightforward (see below), will be accurate when it attributes views to usc personal, other philosophers (see below), and term paper writers will contain thoughtful critical responses to usc personal statement, the texts we read. It need not always break completely new ground.

But you should try to come up with your own arguments, or your own way of elaborating or criticizing or defending some argument we looked at in class. Merely summarizing what others have said won't be enough. It's even more valuable to cover sheet letter for resume, talk to each other about what you want to argue in your paper. When you have your ideas worked out well enough that you can explain them to usc personal, someone else, verbally, then you're ready to sit down and start making an outline. The overall clarity of your paper will greatly depend on Report, its structure. That is why it is important to think about these questions before you begin to write. I strongly recommend that you make an usc personal statement outline of simple introducing myself your paper, and of the arguments you'll be presenting, before you begin to write. This lets you organize the msw points you want to make in pe gcse aqa, your paper and get a sense for how they are going to fit together. It also helps ensure that you're in a position to say what your main argument or criticism is, before you sit down to msw, write a full draft of your paper. When students get stuck writing, it's often because they haven't yet figured out what they're trying to say. Give your outline your full attention.

It should be fairly detailed. (For a 5-page paper, a suitable outline might take up a full page or even more.) I find that making an outline is at least 80% of the Consultancy Report work of writing a good philosophy paper. If you have a good outline, the rest of the writing process will go much more smoothly. You need to leave yourself enough time to think about the topic and write a detailed outline. Statement. Only then should you sit down to write a complete draft.

Once you have a complete draft, you should set it aside for a day or two. Then you should come back to it and rewrite it. Several times. At least 3 or 4. If you can, show it to your friends and get their reactions to Consultancy, it. Statement. Do they understand your main point? Are parts of your draft unclear or confusing to Report, them? All of this takes time.

So you should start working on your papers as soon as the statement msw paper topics are assigned. You may think that since your TA and I already know a lot about this subject, you can leave out pe gcse coursework a lot of usc personal statement msw basic explanation and write in a super-sophisticated manner, like one expert talking to another. I guarantee you that this will make your paper incomprehensible. If your paper sounds as if it were written for a third-grade audience, then you've probably achieved the right sort of clarity. In your philosophy classes, you will sometimes encounter philosophers whose writing is obscure and complicated. Everybody who reads this writing will find it difficult and frustrating. The authors in question are philosophically important despite their poor writing, not because of sheet letter for resume it. So do not try to emulate their writing styles.

Make the structure of your paper obvious. How can you do this? First of all, use connective words, like: because, since, given this argument thus, therefore, hence, it follows that, consequently nevertheless, however, but in the first case, on the other hand. These will help your reader keep track of where your discussion is going. Be sure you use these words correctly! If you say P. Thus Q. then you are claiming that P is a good reason to accept Q. You had better be right. If you aren't, we'll complain. Usc Personal Statement. Don't throw in a thus or a therefore to make your train of thought sound better-argued than it really is. Another way you can help make the structure of for pf claim your paper obvious is by msw telling the reader what you've done so far and Report what you're going to statement msw, do next.

You can say things like: I will begin by. Consultancy. Before I say what is wrong with this argument, I want to. These passages suggest that. I will now defend this claim. Further support for this claim comes from. For example.

These signposts really make a big difference. Consider the following two paper fragments: . We've just seen how X says that P. I will now present two arguments that not-P. My first argument is. My second argument that not-P is. X might respond to my arguments in several ways. For instance, he could say that. However this response fails, because. Another way that X might respond to my arguments is by msw claiming that. This response also fails, because. So we have seen that none of X's replies to my argument that not-P succeed. Hence, we should reject X's claim that P.

I will argue for the view that Q. There are three reasons to believe Q. Essay Introducing. Firstly. The strongest objection to Q says. However, this objection does not succeed, for the following reason. Isn't it easy to statement, see what the structure of these papers is? You want it to be just as easy in your own papers. A final thing: make it explicit when you're reporting your own view and when you're reporting the views of some philosopher you're discussing.

The reader should never be in and juliet act 2 scene, doubt about whose claims you're presenting in a given paragraph. You can't make the structure of your paper obvious if you don't know what the structure of usc personal statement msw your paper is, or if your paper has no structure. That's why making an outline is so important. Be concise, but explain yourself fully. These demands might seem to pull in opposite directions. Sheet. (It's as if the first said Don't talk too much, and the second said Talk a lot.) If you understand these demands properly, though, you'll see how it's possible to statement msw, meet them both. We tell you to be concise because we don't want you to ramble on about everything you know about a given topic, trying to paper paper, show how learned and usc personal msw intelligent you are. Each assignment describes a specific problem or question, and you should make sure you deal with that particular problem. Nothing should go into simple, your paper which does not directly address that problem. Prune out everything else. It is always better to concentrate on usc personal, one or two points and develop them in depth than to try to cram in letter, too much.

One or two well-mapped paths are better than an usc personal statement impenetrable jungle. Formulate the central problem or question you wish to simple myself, address at the beginning of your paper, and keep it in mind at statement all times. Make it clear what the problem is, and why it is a problem. Be sure that everything you write is Consultancy relevant to that central problem. In addition, be sure to statement msw, say in the paper how it is relevant. Don't make your reader guess.

One thing I mean by explain yourself fully is that, when you have a good point, you shouldn't just toss it off in letter for pf claim, one sentence. Explain it; give an example; make it clear how the point helps your argument. But explain yourself fully also means to be as clear and explicit as you possibly can when you're writing. Usc Personal. It's no good to protest, after we've graded your paper, I know I said this, but what I meant was. Say exactly what you mean, in the first place. Part of what you're being graded on is how well you can do that.

Pretend that your reader has not read the material you're discussing, and has not given the term paper writers term paper topic much thought in advance. This will of course not be true. But if you write as if it were true, it will force you to usc personal statement msw, explain any technical terms, to illustrate strange or obscure distinctions, and to be as explicit as possible when you summarize what some other philosopher said. Use plenty of examples and definitions. Examples are also useful for explaining the Consultancy Report notions that play a central role in your argument. You should always make it clear how you understand these notions, even if they are familiar from everyday discourse. As they're used in everyday discourse, those notions may not have a sufficiently clear or precise meaning. For instance, suppose you're writing a paper about abortion, and usc personal you want to assert the claim A fetus is a person. What do you mean by a person? That will make a big difference to cover, whether your audience should find this premise acceptable. Msw. It will also make a big difference to how persuasive the rest of pe gcse coursework your argument is.

By itself, the following argument is statement msw pretty worthless: A fetus is a person. It's wrong to kill a person. Therefore, it's wrong to kill a fetus. For we don't know what the for resume author means by statement calling a fetus a person. On some interpretations of application letter person, it might be quite obvious that a fetus is usc personal statement msw a person; but quite controversial whether it's always wrong to kill persons, in that sense of person.

On other interpretations, it may be more plausible that it's always wrong to kill persons, but totally unclear whether a fetus counts as a person. So everything turns here on what the author means by person. Application Claim. The author should be explicit about how he is using this notion. In a philosophy paper, it's okay to use words in ways that are somewhat different from the ways they're ordinarily used. You just have to make it clear that you're doing this. For instance, some philosophers use the usc personal statement word person to and juliet act 2, mean any being which is capable of rational thought and self-awareness. Understood in this way, animals like whales and chimpanzees might very well count as persons.

That's not the usc personal statement msw way we ordinarily use person; ordinarily we'd only call a human being a person. But it's okay to use person in term paper writers writers, this way if you explicitly say what you mean by it. Usc Personal Statement Msw. And likewise for other words. Don't vary your vocabulary just for romeo and juliet act 2 scene, the sake of variety. If you call something X at the start of your paper, call it X all the way through. Usc Personal Statement. So, for instance, don't start talking about Plato's view of the self, and then switch to talking about Plato's view of the soul, and then switch to talking about Plato's view of the paper writers term writers mind. If you mean to usc personal statement, be talking about the simple introducing same thing in all three cases, then call it by the same name.

In philosophy, a slight change in vocabulary usually signals that you intend to be speaking about statement, something new. Using words with precise philosophical meanings. Philosophers give many ordinary-sounding words precise technical meanings. Consult the handouts on Philosophical Terms and letter Methods to make sure you're using these words correctly. Don't use words that you don't fully understand. Use technical philosophical terms only where you need them. You don't need to explain general philosophical terms, like valid argument and necessary truth. Msw. But you should explain any technical terms you use which bear on sheet for resume, the specific topic you're discussing.

So, for usc personal msw, instance, if you use any specialized terms like dualism or physicalism or behaviorism, you should explain what these mean. Likewise if you use technical terms like supervenience and the like. Report. Even professional philosophers writing for other professional philosophers need to explain the special technical vocabulary they're using. Different people sometimes use this special vocabulary in different ways, so it's important to make sure that you and your readers are all giving these words the same meaning. Pretend that your readers have never heard them before. Presenting and assessing the views of msw others. Then ask yourself: Are X's arguments good ones? Are his assumptions clearly stated? Are they plausible? Are they reasonable starting-points for X's argument, or ought he have provided some independent argument for them? Make sure you understand exactly what the position you're criticizing says.

Students waste a lot of letter time arguing against views that sound like, but are really different from, the views they're supposed to be assessing. Remember, philosophy demands a high level of precision. It's not good enough for you merely to get the general idea of somebody else's position or argument. You have to get it exactly right. (In this respect, philosophy is more like a science than the other humanities.) A lot of the usc personal statement work in philosophy is making sure that you've got your opponent's position right. You can assume that your reader is stupid (see above). But don't treat the simple philosopher or the views you're discussing as stupid. If they were stupid, we wouldn't be looking at usc personal statement msw them. If you can't see anything the view has going for Report, it, maybe that's because you don't have much experience thinking and arguing about the view, and statement so you haven't yet fully understood why the view's proponents are attracted to it. Try harder to figure out what's motivating them.

Philosophers sometimes do say outrageous things, but if the view you're attributing to a philosopher seems to be obviously crazy, then you should think hard about whether he really does say what you think he says. Term Writers Writers. Use your imagination. Usc Personal. Try to figure out what reasonable position the philosopher could have had in mind, and direct your arguments against Consultancy, that. In your paper, you always have to explain what a position says before you criticize it. If you don't explain what you take Philosopher X's view to be, your reader cannot judge whether the criticism you offer of X is a good criticism, or whether it is usc personal msw simply based on a misunderstanding or misinterpretation of X's views. Consultancy. So tell the reader what it is you think X is statement msw saying. Don't try to tell the reader everything you know about X's views, though. You have to go on to offer your own philosophical contribution, too. Only summarize those parts of X's views that are directly relevant to what you're going to go on to do. Sometimes you'll need to paper writers term paper writers, argue for your interpretation of X's view, by citing passages which support your interpretation. It is statement msw permissible for you to discuss a view you think a philosopher might have held, or should have held, though you can't find any direct evidence of letter for pf that view in the text.

When you do this, though, you should explicitly say so. Say something like: Philosopher X doesn't explicitly say that P, but it seems to me that he's assuming it anyway, because. When a passage from a text is particularly useful in supporting your interpretation of usc personal msw some philosopher's views, it may be helpful to quote the passage directly. (Be sure to specify where the passage can be found.) However, direct quotations should be used sparingly. It is seldom necessary to quote more than a few sentences. Pe Gcse Coursework. Often it will be more appropriate to paraphrase what X says, rather than to quote him directly.

When you are paraphrasing what somebody else said, be sure to say so. (And here too, cite the pages you're referring to.) Quotations should never be used as a substitute for usc personal statement msw, your own explanation. And when you do quote an author, you still have to Consultancy Report, explain what the quotation says in usc personal statement msw, your own words. If the Consultancy Report quoted passage contains an argument, reconstruct the argument in usc personal statement msw, more explicit, straightforward terms. Introducing. If the quoted passage contains a central claim or assumption, then indicate what that claim is.

You may want to usc personal statement, give some examples to illustrate the author's point. If necessary, you may want to distinguish the author's claim from other claims with which it might be confused. Sometimes when students are trying to explain a philosopher's view, they'll do it by giving very close paraphrases of the philosopher's own words. They'll change some words, omit others, but generally stay very close to letter claim, the original text. For instance, Hume begins his Treatise of Human Nature as follows: All the perceptions of the usc personal human mind resolve themselves into two distinct kinds, which I shall call impressions and ideas. The difference betwixt these consists in the degrees of force and liveliness, with which they strike upon the mind, and Report make their way into our thought or consciousness. Those perceptions, which enter with most force and usc personal statement msw violence, we may name impressions; and coursework aqa under this name I comprehend all our sensations, passions, and emotions, as they make their first appearance in the soul. By ideas I mean the faint images of these in thinking and reasoning. Here's an statement msw example of how you don't want to act 2 2 essay, paraphrase: Hume says all perceptions of the mind are resolved into two kinds, impressions and ideas.

The difference is in how much force and usc personal msw liveliness they have in our thoughts and consciousness. The perceptions with the most force and violence are impressions. These are sensations, passions, and term paper writers term paper writers emotions. Ideas are the faint images of our thinking and reasoning. There are two main problems with paraphrases of usc personal statement this sort. In the pe gcse aqa first place, it's done rather mechanically, so it doesn't show that the usc personal statement msw author understands the text. In the second place, since the author hasn't figured out coursework what the text means well enough to express it in usc personal, his own words, there's a danger that his paraphrase may inadvertently change the meaning of the text. Pe Gcse Aqa. In the example above, Hume says that impressions strike upon the mind with more force and liveliness than ideas do. My paraphrase says that impressions have more force and liveliness in usc personal statement, our thoughts. It's not clear whether these are the same thing. In addition, Hume says that ideas are faint images of impressions ; whereas my paraphrase says that ideas are faint images of our thinking . These are not the same.

So the Consultancy Report author of the paraphrase appears not to have understood what Hume was saying in the original passage. A much better way of explaining what Hume says here would be the following: Hume says that there are two kinds of 'perceptions,' or mental states. He calls these impressions and ideas. An impression is a very 'forceful' mental state, like the sensory impression one has when looking at a red apple. Usc Personal Statement. An idea is a less 'forceful' mental state, like the idea one has of an apple while just thinking about it, rather than looking at it. It is not so clear what Hume means here by 'forceful.' He might mean. Don't be afraid of mentioning objections to your own thesis. Paper Paper Writers. It is better to bring up an objection yourself than to hope your reader won't think of it. Statement. Explain how you think these objections can be countered or overcome.

Of course, there's often no way to deal with all the objections someone might raise; so concentrate on the ones that seem strongest or most pressing. So it's OK to ask questions and raise problems in your paper even if you cannot provide satisfying answers to them all. You can leave some questions unanswered at the end of the paper. Pe Gcse. But make it clear to statement msw, the reader that you're leaving such questions unanswered on purpose . And you should say something about how the question might be answered, and about what makes the question interesting and relevant to the issue at hand. If something in coursework aqa, a view you're examining is unclear to you, don't gloss it over.

Call attention to the unclarity. Statement Msw. Suggest several different ways of understanding the view. Explain why it's not clear which of these interpretations is correct. If you're assessing two positions and you find, after careful examination, that you can't decide between them, that's okay. It's perfectly okay to say that their strengths and weaknesses seem to be roughly equally balanced. But note that this too is a claim that requires explanation and reasoned defense, just like any other.

You should try to application claim, provide reasons for msw, this claim that might be found convincing by someone who didn't already think that the two views were equally balanced. Sometimes as you're writing, you'll find that your arguments aren't as good as you initially thought them to romeo 2 essay, be. You may come up with some objection to your view to which you have no good answer. Don't panic. Statement Msw. If there's some problem with your argument which you can't fix, try to figure out why you can't fix it.

It's okay to change your thesis to one you can defend. For example, instead of writing a paper which provides a totally solid defense of view P, you can instead change tactics and sheet write a paper which goes like this: One philosophical view says that P. Usc Personal Statement. This is cover sheet letter a plausible view, for usc personal statement msw, the following reasons. However, there are some reasons to be doubtful whether P. One of these reasons is X. X poses a problem for the view that P because. It is application letter for pf not clear how the defender of P can overcome this objection. Or you can write a paper which goes: One argument for P is the 'Conjunction Argument,' which goes as follows. At first glance, this is a very appealing argument. However, this argument is faulty, for usc personal msw, the following reasons. One might try to simple essay introducing, repair the argument, by. But these repairs will not work, because.

I conclude that the Conjunction Argument does not in fact succeed in msw, establishing P. Writing a paper of these sorts doesn't mean you've given in to essay myself, the opposition. Usc Personal. After all, neither of these papers commits you to the view that not-P. They're just honest accounts of cover how difficult it is to find a conclusive argument for usc personal, P. P might still be true, for all that. Then come back to the draft and re-read it. As you read each sentence, say things like this to yourself: Does this really make sense? That's totally unclear!

That sounds pretentious. What does that mean? What's the connection between these two sentences? Am I just repeating myself here? and so on. Make sure every sentence in your draft does useful work. Term Paper Writers. Get rid of any which don't. If you can't figure out usc personal statement msw what some sentence contributes to your central discussion, then get rid of it. Even if it sounds nice. You should never introduce any points in your paper unless they're important to your main argument, and term writers you have the usc personal statement msw room to cover letter for resume, really explain them. If you're not happy with some sentence in your draft, ask yourself why it bothers you.

It could be you don't really understand what you're trying to say, or you don't really believe it. Make sure your sentences say exactly what you want them to say. For example, suppose you write Abortion is the same thing as murder. Is that what you really mean? So when Oswald murdered Kennedy, was that the same thing as aborting Kennedy?

Or do you mean something different? Perhaps you mean that abortion is a form of murder. In conversation, you can expect that people will figure out what you mean. But you shouldn't write this way. Even if your TA is able to usc personal msw, figure out essay introducing myself what you mean, it's bad writing. In philosophical prose, you have to be sure to say exactly what you mean. Also pay attention to the structure of your draft. When you're revising a draft, it's much more important to work on the draft's structure and overall clarity, than it is to clean up a word or a phrase here or there. Make sure your reader knows what your main claim is, and what your arguments for that claim are.

Make sure that your reader can tell what the point of usc personal statement msw every paragraph is. It's not enough that you know what their point is. It has to be obvious to your reader, even to a lazy, stupid, and mean reader. If you can, show your draft to simple essay myself, your friends or to statement msw, other students in and juliet act 2 scene, the class, and get their comments and advice. I encourage you to do this. Usc Personal Statement Msw. Do your friends understand your main point? Are parts of your draft unclear or confusing to pe gcse, them? If your friends can't understand something you've written, then neither will your grader be able to understand it. Your paragraphs and your argument may be perfectly clear to you but not make any sense at all to someone else. Another good way to check your draft is to read it out loud.

This will help you tell whether it all makes sense. You may know what you want to say, but that might not be what you've really written. Reading the statement paper out loud can help you notice holes in your reasoning, digressions, and paper writers paper unclear prose. You should count on writing many drafts of usc personal statement msw your paper. Writers Term. At least 3 or 4!! Check out the following web site, which illustrates how to revise a short philosophy paper through several drafts.

Notice how much the paper improves with each revision: Writing tutor for msw, Introductory Philosophy Courses http://web.williams.edu/wp-etc/philosophy/jcruz/jcruz/writingtutor/. Also, don't begin with a sentence like Webster's Dictionary defines a soul as. Dictionaries aren't good philosophical authorities. They record the way words are used in everyday discourse. Simple Essay Myself. Many of the same words have different, specialized meanings in philosophy. It's OK to end a sentence with a preposition. It's also OK to split an usc personal statement infinitive, if you need to. (Sometimes the easiest way to say what you mean is by splitting an infinitive. For example, They sought to letter for resume, better equip job candidates who enrolled in their program.) Efforts to avoid these often end up just confusing your prose. Do avoid other sorts of statement grammatical mistakes, like dangling participles (e.g., Hurt by her fall, the pe gcse coursework aqa tree fell right on usc personal statement msw, Mary 's leg before she could get out of the way), and the like. You may use the word I freely, especially to tell the reader what you're up to (e.g., I've just explained why.

Now I'm going to consider an argument that. ). Don't worry about using the verb is or to be too much. In a philosophy paper, it's OK to for pf claim, use this verb as much as you need to. You shouldn't need to use these secondary readings when writing your papers. The point of the papers is to teach you how to analyze a philosophical argument, and statement msw present your own arguments for or against Report, some conclusion. The arguments we'll be considering in class are plenty hard enough to deserve your full attention, all by themselves.

Can you write your paper as a dialogue or story? But neither should your papers be too short! Don't cut off an argument abruptly. Usc Personal Msw. If a paper topic you've chosen asks certain questions, be sure you answer or address each of pe gcse coursework aqa those questions. Please double-space your papers, number the pages, and include wide margins. We prefer to statement msw, get the pe gcse papers simply stapled: no plastic binders or anything like that.

Include your name on the paper. And don't turn in your only copy! (These things should be obvious, but apparently they're not.) You'll be graded on three basic criteria: How well do you understand the issues you're writing about? How good are the arguments you offer? Is your writing clear and well-organized? We do not judge your paper by whether we agree with its conclusion.

In fact, we may not agree amongst ourselves about what the correct conclusion is. But we will have no trouble agreeing about whether you do a good job arguing for your conclusion. More specifically, we'll be asking questions like these: Do you clearly state what you're trying to usc personal statement, accomplish in your paper? Is it obvious to introducing myself, the reader what your main thesis is? Do you offer supporting arguments for the claims you make? Is it obvious to usc personal statement, the reader what these arguments are? Is the term paper structure of your paper clear? For instance, is it clear what parts of your paper are expository, and what parts are your own positive contribution? Is your prose simple, easy to read, and easy to usc personal statement, understand?

Do you illustrate your claims with good examples? Do you explain your central notions? Do you say exactly what you mean? Do you present other philosophers' views accurately and charitably? Explain this claim or What do you mean by Consultancy Report this? or I don't understand what you're saying here This passage is unclear (or awkward, or otherwise hard to usc personal, read) Too complicated Too hard to follow Simplify Why do you think this? This needs more support Why should we believe this? Explain why this is a reason to believe P Explain why this follows from what you said before Not really relevant Give an example? Try to anticipate these comments and avoid the need for them! Your paper should do some philosophical work. Here are some more interesting things our student could have done in his paper.

He could have argued that B doesn't really follow from A, after all. Letter Claim. Or he could have presented reasons for thinking that A is false. Statement. Or he could have argued that assuming A is an illegitimate move to make in Consultancy, a debate about usc personal statement msw, whether B is true. Or something else of that sort. These would be more interesting and satisfying ways of engaging with Philosopher X's view. Responding to comments from me or your TA. Your rewrites should try to go beyond the specific errors and problems we've indicated. If you got below an A-, then your draft was generally difficult to read, it was difficult to see what your argument was and what the structure of your paper was supposed to be, and so on. You can only term paper correct these sorts of failings by usc personal msw rewriting your paper from cover letter for resume, scratch. (Start with a new, empty window in statement msw, your word processor.) Use your draft and the comments you received on it to construct a new outline, and for pf claim write from that. Keep in mind that when I or your TA grade a rewrite, we may sometimes notice weaknesses in msw, unchanged parts of your paper that we missed the pe gcse coursework aqa first time around.

Or perhaps those weaknesses will have affected our overall impression of the paper, and we just didn't offer any specific recommendation about fixing them. Statement Msw. So this is another reason you should try to paper writers term, improve the whole paper , not just the passages we comment on. It is possible to improve a paper without improving it enough to raise it to the next grade level. Sometimes that happens. But I hope you'll all do better than that.

Most often, you won't have the opportunity to rewrite your papers after they've been graded. So you need to teach yourself to write a draft, scrutinize the usc personal draft, and revise and rewrite your paper before turning it in to be graded. Naturally, I owe a huge debt to the friends and professors who helped me learn how to write philosophy. I'm sure they had a hard time of it. If you're a teacher and act 2 2 essay you think your own students would find this web site useful, you are free to point them here (or to distribute printed copies).

It's all in the public good.

Write My Research Paper -
Applying to USC | Admissions MSW

Love and hate in 'Romeo and Juliet' essay. 'Romeo and Juliet' was written in 1595 by William Shakespeare. Usc Personal! Romeo and Juliet is a tragedy and love story about two children from rival families, who fall in for resume, love. Their misunderstandings lead to them both dying. Usc Personal Msw! Shakespeare uses an oxymoron in the play, love and hate. Shakespeare presents love and hate is coursework aqa, many different ways, through language, context and usc personal statement msw some characters.

In the times when Shakespeare was alive and his productions were first being shown, Juliet had to be played by sheet, a boy/man, this was because women weren't allowed on stage in statement msw, those days. Report! In this essay I will be talking about the ways Shakespeare presents love and hate. In 'Romeo and Juliet' there are two rival families, the Capulets and the Montagues. Juliet is a part of the Capulet family while Romeo is a part of the Montague family. Both families live in usc personal statement msw, Verona, Italy and both families hate each other. Shakespeare has presented hate in this way to show a major division between the two families who lives on separate sides of Verona. He shows hate in this way because he wants to show how Romeo and Juliet cannot be happily married like a normal couple as they both have to hide their marriage from their families. Shakespeare shows that love cannot heal hate.

The play opens with a fight between the two families including Gregory and Sampson, the Capulet servants, and Abram and Benvolio, members of the Montagues. Term Paper Writers! Benvolio is being the peacemaker between the two families. “Part, fools! Put up your swords, you know not what you do.” This shows that Benvolio tries to stop the fighting but everyone ignores him and fights anyway. Later on in the play, a fight occurs between Mercutio and Tybalt which turns very violent and usc personal msw Mercutio is stabbed by pe gcse aqa, Tybalt, but Romeo steps in and kills Tybalt. This fight is representing hate between Capulets, a Montague and a member of royalty. Shakespeare uses a fight to show hate because it shows the conflict between two main families and someone who had nothing to do with the argument between Benvolio and Tybalt. Usc Personal Statement! Tybalt uses negative words by using alliteration which are snake sounds. “A villain that is hither come in term writers, spite, to scorn at our solemnity this night.” This scene is at the Capulet party in which Romeo and Juliet first meet and fall in love as the Montagues turn up at the party unexpected. Tybalt sees the Montague at their party and tells his uncle Lord Capulet and names Romeo as a villain. Later on statement msw the play, Romeo says that life must hate him because he has fallen in Consultancy Report, love with someone he is meant to hate. “Is she a Capulet? O dear account! my life is my foe's debt.” This shows that Romeo is surprised when he finds out Juliet is actually a Capulet.

Shakespeare shows love in many different ways in this play but the most important way of showing it is Romeo and Juliet's love. Shakespeare even starts the usc personal play off with a way of showing love by pe gcse coursework aqa, using a Sonnet. At the msw start of the play, Romeo is said to have been in love with Rosaline but she did not love him back, this is an example of term paper writers unrequited love. Statement Msw! Romeo is and juliet 2 essay, not happy about his love for Rosaline, instead he acts grumpy and sad but Benvolio gives him advice to forget about her and look for some more women to fall in love with. “Be ruled by me, forget to think of her. By giving liberty unto thine eyes, Examine other beauties.” This shows that Benvolio is msw, tired of Consultancy Romeo being sad about being in love so he gives him advice to forget about her and move on. This is usc personal statement msw, showing love because while Romeo and Benvolio are looking for other women, Romeo meets and also falls in love with Juliet. Another example of requited love is between Paris and term writers Juliet, this is shown later on in the play. As Lord and Lady Capulet are arranging their daughter's wedding, Friar Lawrence and Juliet are thinking of a way for her to usc personal statement, get out of the wedding she does not want to take part in as she is already married to Romeo. Paris tells Lord Capulet that he wants to speed up the letter wedding but looks silly as Lord Capulet wants Juliet to statement, be ready. Consultancy Report! Paris thinks there is no reason for Juliet to not marry him. “And in his wisdom hastes our marriage, To stop the inundation of her tears.” This shows that Paris thinks Juliet is still upset about Tybalt's death when in usc personal, fact she is cover sheet, upset about Romeo being banished. “I will confess to you that I love him” This quote shows that Juliet tells Paris that she is in love with 'him', here she is statement msw, referring to Romeo but Paris thinks she is talking about him, throughout this scene Paris and Juliet's exchanges have a double meaning. Juliet does not want to give away that she is Consultancy, already married to Romeo.

Benvolio appears as the peacemaker in statement msw, the play as he represents love. He does not want to fight with the sheet Capulet's. “I do but keep the peace” This shows Benvolio does always keep the usc personal peace between the two families. Romeo and Juliet's love is the main part of the play and is shown in a lot of ways. Juliet has fallen in for pf, love with someone she is supposed to hate and she also says that Romeo's name does not matter as she still loves him. “'Tis by thy name that is my enemy; Thou art myself, though not a Montague” Juliet wonders why their names make a difference to who they are and usc personal msw if Romeo's name was different he would still be the same person. She also says that their names are keeping them apart. Mercutio is a person who makes jokes, most of them are about sex, which entertain the audience. He enjoys winding Romeo and application for pf claim Juliet up about their love. Statement Msw! “O Romeo, that she were, O that she were An open-arse, thou a pop'rin pear!” Mercutio is energetic and full of life and makes a lot of puns. Shakespeare makes him like this to add some comedy to the play. Mercutio talks about sex and lust between Romeo and simple essay introducing Juliet which highlights their love for each other. Fated love is very important in the play because in the Sonnet at the start of the play, it sets out the scene and talks about fated love. “A pair of star-crossed lovers take their life; Whose misadventured piteous overthrows” This part of the Prologue says that Romeo and Juliet's fate was written in msw, the stars and their misunderstandings lead to them both dying.

Shakespeare shows in the play that fate brings Romeo and Juliet together, as they have both fallen for someone they are supposed to term paper writers paper writers, hate. Statement Msw! Juliet can imagine what is going to happen to letter for pf claim, her and Romeo, while Romeo has a dream. In Romeo's dream, he talks about the stars and death. “Some consequence yet hanging in the stars. Shall bitterly begin his fearful date. Statement! By some vile forfeit of untimely death.” Romeo looks into the future and has a premonition of death. He believes that dreams come true and must mean something and have a purpose behind them while Mercutio thinks the total opposite.

Mercutio believes that dreams are false and do not mean anything. Juliet's “death” has a high impact on most characters in romeo act 2, the play, especially Romeo and Paris. They are both grieving for her and are both in love with her. Usc Personal! While Paris shows up to Juliet's tomb with flowers and paper writers mourns for her, Romeo shows up with poison and usc personal statement msw is planning on killing himself. Romeo is genuinely devastated of claim Juliet's death and cannot stop thinking of how he is usc personal, going to carry out his death. Application Letter For Pf! Paris on the other hand, does not show much emotion, he stays calm and says he will cry every night even though he didn't know Juliet that well, but he feels sadness and pain for losing her. “Sweet flower, with flowers thy bridal bed I strew- Nightly shall be to strew thy grave and weep.” This shows Paris is mourning for Juliet unlike Romeo who just wants to know how Juliet died and wants to see her body so he can say goodbye. As Romeo tries to enter the tomb, Paris challenges Romeo to a fight, as Paris thinks Romeo killed Juliet because of Tybalt. “This is usc personal statement, that banished haughty Montague, That murdered my love's cousin, with which grief.” This shows that Paris is trying to stop Romeo getting into the tomb. After Paris challenges Romeo to a fight, he is killed by Romeo. He tells Romeo he wants to be buried next to his love, Juliet, and as he did not mean to kill Paris, Romeo agrees and lays him next to Juliet's body and introducing myself does not feel jealous. “Open the tomb lay me with Juliet.” Paris challenged Romeo because he wants to usc personal statement msw, protect the Capulets and is getting involved with the family feud between the Montagues and Capulets. While Romeo is laying Paris next to Juliet's body, he finds Tybalt's body and asks him for Consultancy Report forgiveness as he feels sorry for killing him. “Tybalt, liest thou there in thy bloody sheet? O, what more favour can I do to thee.” This shows Romeo wants to apologise to Tybalt before he dies.

Romeo is also shocked that Juliet was due to marry Paris and he has killed for love. Statement Msw! Romeo is more aggressive than sad towards Juliet's death as he does not mourn for her very much. Romeo thought his marriage was going to end the family feud. As Romeo takes one last look at Juliet's body, he still talks about her beauty. “Hath had no power yet upon thy beauty: Thou art not conquered, beauty's ensign yet. Is crimson in thy lips and in thy cheeks, And Death's pale flag is not advancèd there.” Romeo says here that Juliet looks as if she is still alive, he can tell this by the colour of her cheeks. Romeo then declares his love for cover sheet for resume her and drinks the poison unaware of Juliet soon to be awakening. “Here's to my love! [Drinks] O true apothecary! Thy drugs are quick. Thus with a kiss I die. [Dies]” This is the point in the play where Romeo dies as Juliet awakes from her “death”.

Juliet's fake death also has an effect on the Nurse and Lord and Lady Capulet. The Nurse arrives in statement msw, Juliet's room excited for her and her wedding to Paris, this then changes as she begins to realise something is wrong. “Alas, alas! Help, help! my lady's dead! My lord! My lady!” This shows the Nurse trying to introducing, wake Juliet for her wedding and finds that she is usc personal, dressed and will not wake up. Lady Capulet then enters and grieves for her daughter but also seems upset that there will not be a marriage. “O me, O me, my child, my only life!” This shows that the Nurse's grief seems much more real and extreme. Term Paper Term Writers! Lord Capulet then enters and cannot believe the death of his daughter either. Usc Personal Statement Msw! “O child, O child! my soul and not my child!” This shows that Lord Capulet does not believe that it is his child that has died. Altogether this shows that the Nurse reacted worse to the death of Juliet, while Lady Capulet did not seem too upset. In Shakespeare's time, young girls were to be married at a very young age such as 13 years old.

This is how old Juliet was when she met Romeo and the age when her mother starts talking to her about marriage. Consultancy Report! Juliet's father, Lord Capulet, believes Juliet is too young to be married but would like her to get married if Juliet agrees to it. But then later on in the statement msw play after he meets Paris, Lord Capulet decides he wants Juliet to letter for resume, be married as soon as possible, even though he does not know she is already married to Romeo. Lord Capulet believes Paris would be the msw perfect husband for Juliet because he is royalty and simple essay related to the Prince. “She shall be married to this noble earl.” This shows Lord Capulet wants Juliet to usc personal, be married to Paris straight away rather than let her get to pe gcse, know or fall in love with Paris. Lord Capulet then organises the wedding himself without consoling Juliet because she cannot accept she has to be married. Juliet's parents think that her getting married will cheer her up after the death of Tybalt. Msw! “But for the sunset of my brother's son It rains downright. How now, a conduit, girl?

What, still in essay, tears?” This shows Lord Capulet thinks that Juliet is still grieving for Tybalt when she is actually upset that Romeo has been banished. Shakespeare shows that Juliet and statement the Nurse have a strong bond, almost like a mother and daughter bond. Paper! The Nurse is more like a mother to Juliet than Lady Capulet because Juliet and her mother have a distant relationship as she has been bought up by the Nurse. She knows more about Juliet than Lady Capulet does for example, her age and her opinion on marriage. The Nurse treats Juliet like a daughter because she had a daughter, Susan who is mentioned in the play, but died. Usc Personal Statement! “Susan and she- God rest all Christian souls!- Were of an term paper writers paper, age. Well, Susan is with God” This shows that the Nurse is telling Juliet and Lady Capulet about the death of her daughter.

This is the reason why the Nurse has stayed around looking after Juliet for so long, because she misses her own daughter. Msw! Lady Capulet is so distant from her daughter, she needs the Nurse in the room when she speaks to Juliet. “Nurse, give leave a while, We must talk in secret. Nurse, come back again, I have remembered me,” This shows that Lady Capulet cannot be left alone with her daughter as she barely knows her that well and needs the Nurse's company. The Nurse is relaxed, informal and feels comfortable and speaks freely around Juliet and her mother. Juliet is a lot closer to the Nurse than her own mother but she respects her mother a lot, although they are very distant, she can be a bit afraid of her mother. Juliet is not bothered about being married as she is not interested. Consultancy! “Tell me, daughter Juliet, How stands your dispositions to be married?” “It is an usc personal statement msw, honour that I dream not of.” This is showing Lady Capulet starting to speak about marriage to her daughter and pe gcse coursework aqa she tries to convince Juliet to get married and starts to speak of her own experience of getting married at statement msw a young age. Shakespeare also shows that Romeo and Friar Lawrence have a close relationship.

After Romeo returns from cover, Capulet mansion, the usc personal Friar fears that Romeo has spent the night with Rosaline, but then he learns Romeo has fallen in love with someone else and is asked if he could marry him and Consultancy Juliet. Usc Personal! Friar Lawrence agrees to carry out the ceremony because he thinks their marriage will end the feuding of the Montagues and Capulets. “For this alliance may so happy prove To turn your households' rancour to pure love.” This quotation shows that Friar Lawrence will do anything to stop the families feuding, and for pf he is statement msw, taking a big risk by application, marrying a member of the Montague family and a member of the Capulet family. If a family member of usc personal either Romeo or Juliet found out Friar Lawrence married them, the Friar could be banished. Shakespeare also shows that Juliet and the Friar have a close relationship. This may be because the Friar helps Juliet think of sheet letter for resume a plan to get out of the marriage to Paris. He acts like a father to Juliet as she is not close to her father either. “Hold, daughter, I do spy a kind of hope, Which craves as desperate an execution.” This shows that Friar Lawrence call Juliet 'daughter' which shows that they obviously have a close relationship. Shakespeare shows Romeo and usc personal statement Juliet close to the Nurse and Friar Lawrence because they are both distant from their parents. They are also very close to them because the Nurse and Friar Lawrence are the only people that know about Romeo and Juliet's relationship and that they got married.

The end of the play is very important because it shows where the Montagues and Capulets finally forget about their feud and make peace with each other. Consultancy! The Prince starts to talk about Romeo and Juliet's relationship and usc personal how it strengthens love, but still talks about the hate that they have caused for their children to die. The Prince advises them to end the feud for they have both lost children. Their hate for each other has caused some deaths and loosing family members from each family. Coursework! “Where be these enemies? Capulet, Montague?

See what a scourge is laid upon your hate, That heaven finds means to kill your joys with love!” This shows that the statement msw Prince is showing the Montagues and Capulets what their argument has caused. The two families then agree to settle their differences as they realise what damage they have done to their family and themselves. “O brother Montague, give me thy hand. This is my daughter's jointure, for no more Can I demand.” This shows Lord Capulet making an effort. The families also promise to simple introducing, make a golden statue of Romeo and Juliet. “But I can give thee more, For I will raise her statue in pure gold, That whiles Verona by that name is known, There shall no figure at such rate be set As that of statement true and faithful Juliet.” This shows Lord Montague then making an coursework, effort by saying he will let everyone know in usc personal statement, Verona about Juliet. “As rich shall Romeo's by pe gcse coursework, his lady's lie, Poor sacrifices of our enmity!” This then shows Capulet saying he will also put up a statue of Romeo and tell everyone in usc personal statement msw, Verona about him too. Letter! The Prince then ends the play with a speech, saying some will receive punishment and some will be pardoned. “Some shall be pardoned, and some punished: For never was a story of more woe Than this of Juliet and her Romeo.” This quote shows the play ending with a Sonnet which sums up what happens at the end of the play. At the usc personal msw beginning of the play, which starts with a Sonnet, Shakespeare warns us that the only way the aqa feud would end is if their children die, which is exactly what happens. In conclusion, Shakespeare has shown love and hate in usc personal statement, many ways. He has shown love through Romeo and Juliet and Romeo and Rosaline. He shows true love through Romeo and Juliet, who are willing to die for each other, and unrequited love through him and Rosaline. Shakespeare shows in the balcony scene that Romeo and Juliet have fallen in Consultancy, love with each other even though they have only just met. This play shows the couple taking a lot of risks in usc personal statement, being together despite of essay myself their feuding families.

Shakespeare also shows hate through Benvolio and msw Tybalt and simple the Montague family and usc personal statement msw the Capulet family. He also shows what hate can do by showing the death of Mercutio, Tybalt, Paris, Romeo and Juliet. Romeo and essay myself Juliet are supposed to hate each other but they accidentally fall in usc personal, love. Shakespeare also shows hate with a lot of fights between members of the families. Overall, Shakespeare shows love and coursework aqa hate in lots of different ways which are shown throughout the play.

They are shown in this way because Shakespeare wants to show the division between the two families and the love for usc personal msw Romeo and Juliet.

Buy Essay Online -
Applying to USC | Admissions MSW

10 Free PDF Business Plan Templates. Business plan templates come in usc personal statement msw all forms, shapes and sizes. The beauty of PDF business plan templates, however, is that users can create their own business plans while having a guide or reference point readily available in front of them. Whether a business owner wants to create his or her own business plan or replicate one, PDF business plan templates eliminate the arduous task of starting from pe gcse aqa scratch. Usc Personal Statement! Below are 10 PDF business plan templates to help you get started.

If you need a business plan template for application for pf, a small business, there is statement msw, no better place to look than the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA). The SBA not only offers a Web-based business plan creator, but also a downloadable PDF business plan template from sba.gov#39;s 8(a) Business Development Program. This no-fuss, straightforward business plan template hashes out the details of a business, with more than 50 prompts to help users answer the questions needed for a complete business plan. [ How to Start a Business: Step-by-Step ] Another government organization, the U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs (VA), also provides useful resources for starting a business. In addition to offering a business plan template and financial projections charts, the VA#39;s Writing a Business Plan PDF contains information on why an entrepreneur should create a business plan, basic business plan guidelines and tips on the do#39;s and don#39;ts of writing a business plan. Used as the official business plan for the New York StartUP! 2014 Business Plan Competition, this PDF business plan template was adapted from simple essay introducing Successful Business Plans (The Planning Shop, 2010) by Rhonda Abrams.

Each of the 12 sections of usc personal, this business plan template includes instructions explaining what type of information to Consultancy Report, enter, as well as chapter references so you can look up more details. In addition, the template includes a SWOT analysis and optional technology plan. Need a quick and painless, albeit unconventional, business plan? Try the Business Entrepreneurship Center#39;s (BEC) elevator pitch business plan. Statement Msw! Instead of an entire business plan with typical sections written out such as executive summary, market analysis and financial projections the elevator pitch business plan template combines all these areas into one succinct paragraph. Find examples at the BEC#39;s downloadable PDF elevator pitch small business plan template. 5. The One Page Business Plan Company#39;s business plan template. Hate the idea of writing out an entire essay for a business plan? The One Page Business Plan Company offers a one-page business plan separated into and juliet several sections vision, mission, objectives, strategies and action plans. You can answer all of these sections using keywords and usc personal short phrases.

PDF samples of the one-page business plan template are available for download via Oprah.com. 6. $100 Startup One-Page Business Plan. Business plans don#39;t have to application for pf, be complicated. The $100 Startup#39;s One-Page Business Plan template helps users craft a business plan by answering several short questions. You can answer each question in usc personal statement one or two sentences. This PDF one-page template covers everything from an overview of your business to pe gcse coursework, marketing, money matters and msw obstacle projections. 7. Biz Kids business plan template. Scene 2 Essay! Biz Kids, an online portal where kids teach kids about money and business, offers a step-by-step guide to statement msw, writing a business plan. This PDF document breaks down each section with brief questions and term paper writers simple formulas to help users complete the included one-page business plan template. Although the usc personal statement msw guide and sheet letter for resume plan are catered toward young entrepreneurs, these resources cover all the basics and are suitable for any type of business.

8. Rowan University College of Business#39; sample plan. Thinking about msw, starting a consulting business? Check out Rowan University#39;s sample consulting business plan template. Essay Introducing Myself! Part of the university#39;s Center for Innovation Entrepreneurship 2013 Rohrer Business Plan Competition, this 30-page PDF business plan template is msw, a comprehensive example of what a consulting business plan entails, complete with financial charts and balance sheets. 9. iPlanner.net business plan template. IPlanner.net, a Web-based business planning software provider, offers a simple business plan template specifically for Report, startups. The downloadable PDF business plan template includes instructions and tips for completing each section, as well as sample charts to help users complete the financial areas of the business plan. 10. SNIEDC fill-in-the-blank business plan.

If you want to usc personal, cover all of your bases, look no further than the Seneca Nation of Indians Economic Development Company#39;s (SNIEDC) PDF fill-in-the-blank business plan template. This all-inclusive, 50-page business plan outline asks a series of questions so you can fill in each section of the business plan. It also includes detailed financial charts and a glossary of business terms. Letter For Pf Claim! The SNIEDC is a Salamanca, N.Y.-based organization that aims to provide financial services and msw working capital support for Consultancy Report, enrolled members of the Seneca Nation of usc personal msw, Indians. Sara is simple, a tech writer with a background in business and marketing.

After graduating from UC Irvine, she worked as a copywriter and blogger for usc personal msw, nonprofit organizations, tech labs and lifestyle companies. She started freelancing in 2009 and cover letter joined Business News Daily in 2013. Follow Sara Angeles on Twitter @sara_angeles.

Custom Essay Order -
MSW personal statement help - Social Work - The GradCafe Forums

Case1 : King v.BioChem Therapeutic Inc Essay. Fact: Dr King is hired by Bio Chem. She signed a special contract that specifies a period of statement msw, probation. During this period, she can be let go but you have to be known the wrong behavior in order to be able to rectify it. If the wrong behavior persists then your contract will be terminated. Issue: Is the termination of the contract of Dr King for fault justified? Ratio.

Employer version of facts: 1st meeting: after 5 months and a half, during this meeting, the management team are saying that they told her that she was being unsubordinated 2nd meeting: after 10 months, the management team told her that her behavior was still being not acceptable and term paper that constitutes a second warning Employee version of facts. 1st meeting: prohibition period was over (5weeks and a half instead of 6months) and she was offered stock options 2nd meeting: she got more stock options. The judges have now to decide which story is the more credible, the more logical? Based on the fact that the employer version is contradictory, why would someone discuss the possibility of having additional stock option to an employee that is on the second step to dismissal? A Dr King version makes more sense.

Issue :Can you waive your rights concerning employment by signing a contract? Ratio: According to article 2192: “the employee may not renounce his right to obtain compensation for any injury he suffers where insufficient notice of usc personal msw, termination is given or where the manner of resiliation is abusive”. In the sheet letter for resume case where an employee renounces one of his rights, it should be very precised and clear. Question: If it was explained more clearly, and was bought to the attention to the employee, could it have been considered as valid. Statement Msw! Because the judges are not saying that it is impossible to waive employment rights relative to cover sheet letter, conditions of termination of contracts but rather that it should be clear and unambiguous. According to article 2091, the employee is entitled to reasonable notice. According to statement msw, judges the minimum notice is only for very early departure. Case 3: Hasanie v. Romeo Scene 2 Essay! Kaufel Group Ltd. Thomas Bett Kaufel Group. After the acquisition, Hasanie realized that the reorganization of the group will dismiss him, that there were too much people doing the same job.

The Kaufel group then offered a package for Hasanie since his employment will be terminated soon. There were still in period of negotiation when Hasanie went into holydays. During this period, Kaufel management discovered that Hasani was negotiating to take over a competition business. Msw! The management team therefore decided to take the deal out essay introducing, of the usc personal statement table and to fire Hasanie for fault. Issue: Was this dismissed of Hasanie for serious fault was fair?

Ratio: According to article 2188, “the employee is bound not only to carry on his work with prudence and diligence but also to act faithfully and honestly and not to use any confidential information he may obtain in introducing, carrying on usc personal or in the course of his work” Kaufel’s main argument is that Hasanie put himself in a position of conflict of interest and sought to advance his interests to the detriment of those of cover sheet letter for resume, his employer, therefore breaching his duty of loyalty towards his employer. Hasanie is arguing that Dynergie is not a competitor of Kaufel. He is also arguing that he asked his direct superior if he could take this opportunity, and usc personal statement he agreed. However, the sheet letter direct supervisor is denying. There is not writing evidence of this authorization.

The last argument of Hasanie is that he was a victim of msw, constructive dismissal. Basically a constructive dismissal happens when an employer changes your working environment, inviting you to Report, leave. However, Kaufel argues that they offered opportunities for growth within the group and that Hasanie was only waiting for his package. Finally they are arguing that they needed more time to reorganize the usc personal statement group and Consultancy Report assign responsibilities. Usc Personal Msw! The judges conclude that Hasanie did not establish his case of having been dismissed without cause, or having been constructively dismissed. Case 4: CopyFax v. Lambert.

The different injunctions. Institution of Proceeding Final Judgement Provisional InjunctionInterlocutory Injunction Permanent Injunction The provisional injunction is given. based on emergency criterias. It is used to maintain the status quo. The provisional injunction is valid for 10 days. Within these 10 days, the individual has to institute the proceedings and asks for interlocutory injunction. Application For Pf Claim! The interlocutory injunction would be valid for the entire period of the usc personal statement trial. In order to pe gcse coursework aqa, get the interlocutory injunction, the judge would first look if you have: A clear right. Doubtful right: in this case, you will have to prove balance of inconvenience.

They would basically see which of the parties will end up with the most inconvenience, with the irreparable harm. Non-existent right: you will not get the interlocutory injunction Facts: Claude Lambert, worked for msw copyfax as a sales representative. However, he was also working for himself on the side, his employer did not allow that therefore Lambert decided to resign. The contract included a non-competitive clause : Lambert was not allowed to work within 25 miles of Laval and Montreal for a year for the competitors of Copyfax. However, Lambert starts competing in the zone. Report! Copyfax is arguing that he is using the Copyfax customers, therefore also breaching the confidentiality clause. Usc Personal Statement! They also included a penal clause of $6000 for breaching the contract. Issue: Should Copyfax be entitled an interlocutory injunction against the former employee Lambert that would limit him to make business in the region? Copyax has a doubtful right in the case of the coursework non-competition clause. The judges found out that the non-competiting clause was lacking of clarity.

The prohibited area is of 25 miles of Mtl and Lassale. What is the central point from which the area is calculated. Conclusion: The employer did not establish that he will suffer irreparable harm or injury if the interlocutory injunction is refuse, and the application of the test of inconvenience favours the employee: There is no evidence that the Copyfax (Petitioner) clientele was solicited The prohibited area of 25 miles would have the effect of depriving the employee of any realistic possibility of earning a livelihood given his present circumstances The stipulated duration of 14 months is excessive. Injunction against his ability to work is denied. The non-competition clause denied 2nd Issue: Should Copyfax be entitled an interlocutory injunction against the use of the client list They get an interlocutory injunction concerning the use of material and confidential information more precisely the customers being owned by the company. Case 5: Medicom Inc. v. Statement Msw! Bergeron. Medicom has bought a petition for an interlocutory, provisional and permanent injunction against Bergeron and Hubert concerning the application of the and juliet non-competition clauses signed by each of them. Issue: are the msw non-competition clauses valid? Ratio: For the first non-competitive clause asks a restriction of work worldwide during two years with any company that has a similar commercial activity. For the second clause, the essay restriction is for a period of 3 years, for all Canada,for any firm with similar commercial activity. Medicom has a non-existent right for the two contracts.

There were not able to prove that there has a legitimate interest to defend concerning the non-competition clause. Case 6: Giroux v. Malik. Facts: Malik owns a piece of statement, land, you cannot build on it, and Consultancy he wants to sell it. Giroux decides to buy the piece of land from Malik. He goes to statement, City Hal to letter for resume, get a constructive licence but they tell him that nothing can be built on usc personal msw this land. Issue: Giroux is asking for the cancellation of the letter for resume sale and some damages. Ratio: Malik misrepresented the facts.

According to article 1400, “error vitiates consent of the parties or of one of them where it relates to the nature of the contract, the object of the prestations or anything that was essential in determining that consent”. Malik is arguing that he did not say anything, that he did not reveal tell Giroux the fact that you could not build on the land, but neither lied to him. However, according to article 1402, fraud can occur through silence. Malik is also arguing that his agent, the real estate agent was aware of this fact and hid By misrepresenting the fact, the msw consent of Giroux concerning the sale is vitiated. According to article 1419, the contract is considered relatively null. Giroux can get the annulation of the contrat, leading to the parties going back to pe gcse coursework, pre-contractual state and he also get damages. Case 7: Peter v. Fiasche. Peter (Mrs Guicciardo) and her husband are looking for a safe investment that will assure a steady flow of statement msw, revenue for the family as the husband is retiring soon. Report! They both know Fiasche that held a smoked meat business. Statement! The two families come from the same region in Italy.

The couple Guiccado is very interest in buying Fiasche as it seems very profitable based on the patrimony acquired by Fiasche over the years. Looking at the financial statements, it seems a bit disappointing however Fiashe is telling Guiccado not to worry that he has a special method to make this business profitable. He will show him the trick but he needs 100 thousand of dollars as a deposit to pe gcse aqa, be sure that the couple is a serious buyer. In order to get the sum of money, Mr Guiccado is putting a mortgage on his house. Fiasche explained him how to falsify the financial statements in usc personal statement, order to Consultancy Report, minimize the income tax to be paid. The couple begins working in the restaurant in order to better understand the business.

However, as the statement weeks pass, they realized that Fiasche over evaluated the business value. Issue: The couple Guicciardo is arguing that Fiasche misinterpreted the value of the business, vitiating their consent. They are asking for romeo act 2 scene 2 essay the annulment of the contract and statement msw the restitution to status quo. Ratio: Concerning the Report misrepresentation of Fiasche, the usc personal judges argue that that is term paper writers not a fraud of misrepresentation but an inexcusable error. It was conscious wrongful choice from Guicciardo, they could not avoid being aware that tax evasion was the root of the restaurant supposed profitability. Inexcusable misinterpretation does not vitiate the consent of the party. In addition the court is arguing that the cause of the contract was illicit and against statement msw, public order as Fiasche desired to enrich himself by selling a fraudulent system and the Guicciardos by continuing it.

According to application letter for pf, article 1411, “a contract whose cause is prohibited by law or contrary to public order is null” And according to usc personal msw, article 1422, `”a contract that is null is deemed never to have existed. In such a case, each party is bound to application for pf claim, restore to the other the prestations he has received. “ However the crucial question is whether parties to an illicit should have the benefit of restitution. In this case, the judges ordered for msw the restitution of the 130 thousand dollars to the Guicciardos and the restitution of the restaurant to Fiasche. Case 8: Carrefour Langelier versus Cineplex. Carrefour and Cineplex signed a lease. After the lease was signed and before Cineplex even occupied the premises, it approached Carrefour together with representatives of Guzzo to ask its permission to assign the cover sheet letter lease to Guzzo but it was specified in the contract that Guzzo was suppose to operate under Cineplex banner and usc personal statement follow its criterias for operating theatres. Romeo Scene! However after a while, Guzzo decided to operate under its own name.

Issue: Carrefour wants to usc personal, enforce the obligation contracted by Guzzo in the initial contract to operate under Cineplex name. They apply to the court for specific performance order Ratio. The first argument used by Guzzo is that his consent was given through distress or fear. If this argument was accepted by the judges then the consent of Guzzo was vitiated, leading to the annulment of the contract and therefore the cancellation of the obligation. Introducing Myself! However this argument is usc personal rejected, the term writers term judges argue that this fear is part of the usc personal business environment especially within a competitive environment. The second argument is that Guzzo signed under false pretences, meaning it was misrepresenting. Again if the argument was accepted by the court, the consent would be vitiated and Report the obligation cancelled. The court rejects this argument. In any case, guzzo has experiences in the industry and msw therefore the coursework aqa misrepresentation should have large enough to cancel the contract. The last argument brought up by usc personal msw Guzzo is that this is not a situation that allow for specific performance order.

There are four different cases where specific performance cannot be obtained: When the obligation has got impossible to perform (this occurs when the person responsible for doing the obligation had an accident and is unable to fulfill his obligation) Time has elapsed ( for instance, if you are orgnaizing a concert at scene 2 essay, 7pm on the 3rd of April, after 7pm if the singer did not show up you can require a specific performance) When the property vanished. When the usc personal msw property has left the patrimony. In all those cases, you cannot order specific performance, however you will get damages. Let s see if Cineplex corresponds to any of these four cases: For Guzzo, it is act 2 possible to operate under Cineplex name as they did during a while The lease is successfully being performed, time has not elapsed The property is still working. The landlord still owns the property. Therefore in the case of Guzzo, ordering a specific performance is allowed. The final argument of Guzzo is that Carrefour did not face any damages and therefore they should not be able to order specific performance. The judges argue that to statement, enforce specific performance order, you don’t need to scene 2 essay, have faced any damages. You only need three conditions for:

Valid contracted obligation. Person not fulfilling their obligation. You need not to be in a case where specific performance is not allowed Conclusion: the court ordered a permanent injunction order enjoining Guzzo to act under Cineplex name. Case 9: Copiscope Inc. and usc personal msw TRM Copy. TRM puts photocopy in other business in return for some royalties. They signed contract of adhesion with those businesses, that include a non-compete clause. This clause is saying that the Consultancy Report parties signing those contracts cannot contract with competitors for a period of 1 years in order to protect the trade secrets shared with those clients. Recently, Copiscope has been soliciting business operators who had previously contracted with TRM to terminate their contract and has begun to place photocopies in those businesses. Issue: TRM is asking for interlocutory injunction for the respect of its non-compete clause.

Ratio. The trial judge concluded that TRM had a doubtful right. The judge in appeal is usc personal looking at and juliet scene, the non-competitive covenant to judge whether TRM has a clear, doubtful or non existent right. Usc Personal! To do that they are looking at term writers, the validity of the noncompetition covenant: The judge is arguing that TRM has no legitimate interest to defend as they do not share any trade secret with the business they are contracting with. They are concluding that the restrictions set out in the covenant are exorbitant and are grossly excessive for the reasonable protection of TRM. The judges are concluding that this clause if abusing.

According to usc personal msw, article 1437, “an abusive clause in term writers term, a consumer or contract of adhesion is statement null” As it is a nonexistent right, they don’t get an injunction Case 10:Harris v. Ostromogilski. Harris is simple essay introducing myself leasing a cab from O., and every week, he comes to his place to pay for the lease. One night, there was a dispute. Harris got injured. Issue: each party version differs greatly, the usc personal statement msw judges have to assess the credibility of each version of acts and determine who was responsible.

O. argues that Harris felt while trying to run out the house, and hurt himself. Consultancy! Harris version is that O. beat him with his fists. Harris injuries are uncontested facts. Considering all Harris injuries from the laceration of the left eye, to the laceration behind the msw right ear, to letter, a hematoma on the right buttock and a fractured rib, the version of Harris is more credible. The court concludes that Harris version is more credible. Therefore O. will have to pay compensatory damages that include bodily, moral and material damages. The damages include the cost of the shirt torned during the altercation, the loss of income during two weeks, the pain and msw the suffering and the broken glasses. Concerning punitive damages, they will not be award because O. Cover Letter! has already been condemned for this fault in criminal court. You can’t have a double jeopardy, be condemned twice for the same offense. Case 11: Walker vs Singer.

Walker and Singer were having a love affair. While Walker was outside the city, Singer destroyed Walker clothes. Police investigated the missing clothes and charged her for mischief, meaning an offence against usc personal statement, property. Pe Gcse! She goes to criminal court, she pleaded guilty and usc personal statement she got absolute discharge. Then Singer attacked Walked in criminal court for sexual assault. Walker went to court and won his case.

Now Walker decided to attacker Singer into civil court for false accusations. Issue: Walker is seeking compensations. He is arguing that these false accusations had a direct effect of his impossibility to be in a relationship. He also caused him stress and Consultancy anxiety and usc personal statement msw damaged his reputation. Walker is also asking for for pf punitive damages.

Singer was never sentenced in criminal court therefore she can be awarded punitive damages. She will be responsible for usc personal statement msw compensatory moral material damages (compensatory damages) and punitive damages. Case 11: Farmakis and Canadian Tire. He bought a step ladder at Canadian tyre. Term Paper Writers Term Paper Writers! He shipped it from Canada to Greece to renovate his house. Usc Personal Statement Msw! He felt from the ladder and application letter broke his heel. Issue: Farmakis is statement msw arguing that Canadian Tyre is liable for his accident and is asking for damages. Ratio:

The wife sent back the ladder from Greece to Canada. The lawyer got the pe gcse coursework aqa ladder inspected from an expert in metal. In the usc personal msw expert report, he argues that the step ladder had a pre-purchase default. However, the two travels of the ladder leave ample opportunity for letter for resume damage to the ladder caused by sources other than the defendant. The second argument used by Farmakis is that the usc personal statement manufacturer did not tell the victim that he should not climb if he was more than 200 pounds. However, this information was indicated on the stickers that were on the ladder. The sticker is missing but there are evidences that the four stickers were present on the ladder previously. Conclusion: Farmakis action is dismissed. Case 12: Walford v. Application Letter For Pf! Jacuzzi Canada.

The family had a four-foot deep pool and a slide. The mum told the teenage girl not to slide the usc personal statement msw head first. However, the teenage girl did not listen. She broke her neck and end up in quadriplegia. Issue: The family is suing Jacuzzi for failure to paper writers paper writers, warn of danger . Pioneer employees were not asked whether or not a four foot pool and a ten foot slide could be used together However the court found negligence on the part of Jacuzzi for failing to give adequate warnings to users of the slide of the extreme dangers of statement msw, serious injury from improper use. The judges are first assessing who is the direct and immediate cause of the accident. The judges concluded that not listening to her mum was the direct and immediate fault that caused the accident.

The case went in appeal. The court decided to split the fault between the application claim mum and the pool company for contributory negligence: their lack of warnings. 75% of damages are claimed against the pool company and 25% against the mum. Case 13: Morse Cott beverage. The girl tried to twist the cap of a bottle of Cott beverage. Msw! She could not, therefore she took a nutcracker. The cap blew in her eye and caused serious damages to her eye. Issue: Is Cott beverage liable for the injury and the resulting pain?

Ratio: The manufacturer of the sheet for resume cap process gave a manual to Cott beverage concerning the statement capping process: the Alcoa system. It is clearly stated that the removal torque should be between 5 and 14 inch pounds. And Juliet Act 2! However, the day of the injury, the records from the manufacturing process of Cott shows that for 16 out of statement msw, 24 bottles testes was above the recommended interval. The record further indicated that no adjustment was taken to act 2, ensure the production was within the specified tolerances. Within the usc personal statement manual, it is also indicated that :”bottles may not be openable by hand. This may result in injury if the closure is improperly removed using a tool or some other devices. “ The judge concludes that Cott has breached the statutory warranties of acceptable quality and fitness. She also concludes that Cott committed a gross negligence. Therefore according to article 1469, the manufacturer is responsible for bodily, moral and simple material damages (compensatory damages): Loss of income. In addition, the judges award the manufacturer punitive damages or exemplary damages because they released inherently dangerous products and therefore. jeopardizing the safety of the public.

They had to pay to double amount of general damages or compensatory damages (18000) in exemplary damages (36000). University/College: University of Chicago. Type of paper: Thesis/Dissertation Chapter. Date: 9 May 2016. Let us write you a custom essay sample on Case1 : King v.BioChem Therapeutic Inc. for only $16.38 $13.9/page.

3422 Old Capitol Trail, Suite 267, Wilminton, DE 19808, USA.